Field Systems and Services

Synthetic Turf vs Natural Grass

Synthetic Turf vs Natural Grass

Constructing an athletic field requires thorough research to select a surface that meets the program’s goals and budget. Key factors include preferences, sports played, usage, maintenance, budget, climate, and installation costs.

Let’s examine the pros and cons of Natural Grass and Synthetic Turf.

GRASS FIELD

Pros

Cons

SYNTHETIC TURF

Pros

Cons

Budgetary constraints often play a key role in choosing between natural and synthetic turf for an athletic field. Natural turf fields have a lower initial cost but demand extensive maintenance to remain in playable condition, which can become costly. In contrast, synthetic turf fields have a higher installation cost but require minimal maintenance, offer a consistently uniform surface, and are not subject to the usage limitations of natural turf fields.

Here are some basic budget numbers comparing grass and synthetic fields:

This is how FieldTurf provides the best value:
 Natural GrassFieldTurf
Base Preperation$150,000$320,000
Materials$2.75 per sq foot = $220,000$4.75 per sq foot = $380,000
Maintenance$20,000 x 10 years = $200,000$5,000 x 10 years = $50,000
Total$570,000$750,000
Scheduling Possibilities25 hours x 25 weeks x 10 years = 6.250 hours68 hours x 44 weeks x 10 years = 29.920 hours
Average Cost Per Hour of Use$91.20$25.07

Figures based on 80,000 square foot fields and average costs and usage rates across North America